Ending the War On (certain) Drugs? |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
Ganja
Sensi Administrator
Joined: 13 June 2003 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4847 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Ending the War On (certain) Drugs?Posted: 18 May 2009 at 12:02 |
|
I'm not sure whether to feel optimistic about this announcement.
On one hand, I've never heard a highly placed US official (especially their 'drug czar' who is traditionally a propaganda-spouting nutcase) speak this openly about the WOD. On the other hand, we may just be seeing a rebranding and relaunch of exactly the same policies under a fluffier, more victim-friendly name. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124225891527617397.html Kerlikowske Says Analogy Is
Counterproductive; Shift Aligns With Administration Preference for Treatment
Over Incarceration
In his
first interview since being confirmed to head the White House Office of National
Drug Control Policy, Gil Kerlikowske said Wednesday
the bellicose analogy was a barrier to dealing with the nation's drug
issues. "Regardless
of how you try to explain to people it's a 'war on drugs' or a 'war on a
product,' people see a war as a war on them," he said. "We're not at war with
people in this country." Gil Kerlikowske, the new White
House drug czar, signaled Wednesday his openness to rethinking the government's
approach to fighting drug use. Mr. Kerlikowske's comments are a signal that the Obama administration is set to follow a more moderate -- and
likely more controversial -- stance on the nation's drug problems. Prior
administrations talked about pushing treatment and reducing demand while
continuing to focus primarily on a tough criminal-justice
approach. The Obama administration is likely to deal with drugs as a
matter of public health rather than criminal justice alone, with treatment's
role growing relative to incarceration, Mr. Kerlikowske said. Already,
the administration has called for an end to the disparity in how crimes
involving crack cocaine and powder cocaine are dealt with. Critics of the law
say it unfairly targeted African-American communities, where crack is more
prevalent. The
administration also said federal authorities would no longer raid
medical-marijuana dispensaries in the 13 states where voters have made medical
marijuana legal. Agents had previously done so under federal law, which doesn't
provide for any exceptions to its marijuana
prohibition. During the
presidential campaign, President Barack Obama also talked about ending the federal ban on funding
for needle-exchange programs, which are used to stem the spread of HIV among
intravenous-drug users. The drug
czar doesn't have the power to enforce any of these changes himself, but Mr.
Kerlikowske plans to work with Congress and other
agencies to alter current policies. He said he hasn't yet focused on
Mr. Kerlikowske was most recently the police chief in
Mr. Kerlikowske said he opposed the city's 2003 initiative on
police priorities. His officers, however, say drug enforcement -- especially for
pot crimes -- took a back seat, according to Sgt. Richard O'Neill, president of
the Seattle Police Officers Guild. One result was an open-air drug market in the
downtown business district, Mr. O'Neill said. "The
average rank-and-file officer is saying, 'He can't control two blocks of
Sen. Tom
Coburn, the lone senator to vote against Mr. Kerlikowske, was concerned about the permissive attitude
toward marijuana enforcement, a spokesman for the conservative Oklahoma
Republican said. Others said
they are pleased by the way
Mr. Kerlikowske said the issue was one of limited police
resources, adding that he doesn't support efforts to legalize drugs. He also
said he supports needle-exchange programs, calling them "part of a complete
public-health model for dealing with addiction." Mr. Kerlikowske's career began in
"While we
were sitting there, the guy we're buying from is smoking pot and his toddler
comes over and he blows smoke in the toddler's face," Mr. Kerlikowske said. "You go home at night, and you think of
your own kids and your own family and you realize" the depth of the
problem. Since then,
he has run four police departments, as well as the Justice Department's Office
of Community Policing during the
Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance, a group that supports
legalization of medical marijuana, said he is "cautiously optimistic" about Mr.
Kerlikowske. "The analogy we have is this is like
turning around an ocean liner," he said. "What's important is the damn thing is
beginning to turn." James
Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, the nation's largest
law-enforcement labor organization, said that while he holds Mr. Kerlikowske in high regard, police officers are
wary. "While I
don't necessarily disagree with Gil's focus on treatment and demand reduction, I
don't want to see it at the expense of law enforcement. People need to
understand that when they violate the law there are
consequences." |
|
|
No grow questions to me by PM, please.
Check the FAQ & try searching. It's likely your question has been answered. If it hasn't, please post your question on the forums, where everyone can answer. |
|
![]() |
|
Ganja
Sensi Administrator
Joined: 13 June 2003 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4847 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 May 2009 at 12:19 |
|
Norm Stamper, a member of LEAP writing for the Huffington Post makes a very good point about the US budget being a good predictor of we can probably expect from this apparent reform:
“So, in
retiring the phrase from the federal lexicon will we really be ending the "War on Drugs"?
Hardly. We can reasonably expect in the face of Kerlikowske's pronouncement, an expression of shock and a
circling of the wagons from key institutional forces, from frontline drug
warriors to profiteering drug traffickers; from well-meaning but naïve PTAs to
patronizing, fear-mongering politicians; from Big Pharma to the prison industrial complex. There's just too
much at stake, financially and ideologically, to end this remarkably divisive
and durable war. Is the
Obama administration serious about implementing drug
policy reform? We all know the significance of a presidential budget. It's
essentially dollars and cents representing policies and
priorities. What does the administration's "National
Drug Control Budget" tell us about the Obama
approach to drug issues? In the
2010 budget, prevention takes a 10.6 percent hit while domestic law enforcement
gets a boost of 2.3 percent, with "interdiction" (military and police actions
designed to stem the flow of drugs into and about the country) gaining 4.4
percent. On the positive side of the ledger, treatment shows a 4.4 percent
increase. And what of the never-ending seesaw battle between supply and demand
initiatives? Unfortunately, demand reduction efforts (education, prevention) are
down 0.8 percent, while (generally futile) supply reduction initiatives
(enforcement, burning or poisoning crops) gets a 2.7 percent bump.
Still, it's
way too early to dismiss the Obama/Biden/Kerlikowske
approach as just so much smoke and mirrors. The country is a-rumble with signs
of change.” Norm StamperRetired Seattle police chief, member of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition http://www.huffingtonpost.com/norm-stamper/new-drug-czar-were-not-at_b_203711.html |
|
|
No grow questions to me by PM, please.
Check the FAQ & try searching. It's likely your question has been answered. If it hasn't, please post your question on the forums, where everyone can answer. |
|
![]() |
|
Ganja
Sensi Administrator
Joined: 13 June 2003 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4847 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 May 2009 at 10:42 |
|
bump
|
|
|
No grow questions to me by PM, please.
Check the FAQ & try searching. It's likely your question has been answered. If it hasn't, please post your question on the forums, where everyone can answer. |
|
![]() |
|
Solidopc
Sensi Advanced Grower
Joined: 19 June 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1994 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 May 2009 at 11:32 |
|
Load of old tosh. Just getting rid of a slogan, not the policies. All bloomin talk i rekon. It's all so low down on their list of things to do anyway, even if Obama is in office for two terms, i don't think any major changes will be made. Only good thing is they are stopping raiding medical dispensries, and legal medical growers.
|
|
|
Green-Thumb Growing
|
|
![]() |
|
Jonney
Sensi Advanced Grower
Joined: 27 June 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 745 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 May 2009 at 21:17 |
|
Just had a glance there. Will give it a good read when i've finished the dinner!
![]() |
|
|
"It is possible that a certain amount of brain damage is of therapeutic value."
Dr Paul Hoch ------------------------------ |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |