knowledge |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
planetman
Sensi Seedling
Joined: 19 April 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 51 |
Quote Reply
Topic: knowledgePosted: 13 November 2007 at 02:01 |
|
the two biggest sources of heartache concerning the weed both originated from tricky-dick's office. he was one bent and careless crook who many seem to still believe.then it dwindles down to the pharmacorps and the booze peddlers. it has very little to do with health or your well being. people walk around under 'happy legal pills' that is fed to the public as anti depressants etc.that are in fact, very dependence prone and dangerous with their side effects. the politics of marijuana has hurt more people than the weed itself. and one of these days when The Good Lord gets good and pissed off they're all going straight to hell for the suffering they've caused this planet. i have yet to see real people up in goverment who really have good social knowledge and outlooks.(which is, doubtful in that generation)power to earth people. let's do it, this is our planet.
|
|
![]() |
|
Ganja
Sensi Administrator
Joined: 13 June 2003 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4861 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 November 2007 at 10:13 |
|
I think that pharmaceutical interests are probably the biggest single opponent of free and legal cannabis in modern times.
The industrial aspect is less important these days, as so few primary and secondary industries are even based in the west any more. But allowing people to grow 'herbal prozac' in their back-garden, in a natural form that no company can patent or copyright? No way! It's a multi-billion dollar market that could be endangered if people were allowed a safe, free medicine! Better to keep locking folks up... |
|
|
No grow questions to me by PM, please.
Check the FAQ & try searching. It's likely your question has been answered. If it hasn't, please post your question on the forums, where everyone can answer. |
|
![]() |
|
planetman
Sensi Seedling
Joined: 19 April 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 51 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 November 2007 at 15:17 |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Theresagreen
Sensi Seedling
Joined: 30 September 2008 Location: london uk Online Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 16:11 |
|
Recently I was thinking how easy it could be to ammend current uk legislation, using certain rules which must be applied to interpreting statutes. If the inclusion of one understanding of a word, must exclude the opposite understanding- then 'use of drugs' MUST EXCLUDE 'misuse of drugs', when implementing it. Another rule of interpreting is that the act must be viewed as a whole, it must therefore follow that the Title words must be inluded, which should place 'use of drugs' beyond the power of uk gov law.
Given that the current legislation was tailored to govern an outdated society, it fails to account for the twenty-first century lifestyles of today's societies. There is sufficient responsibility stemming from the Euopean Union, to oversee implementing laws which refect true understandings of 'reasonable use of socially acceptable drugs'. In 2008, society's demographic reflects a majority of those which accept herbs as a reasonable part of that society. The EU can input true statistics, evidence and understanding that shows mary J as being a very achieving part of nature, when used properly. If people are expected to move with the times, the instuments by which they are governed must move with the times, because law should remain non contradictory and reasonable.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |